When to use it, a subject line, a body you can paste and fill, what to attach, how to word impact, and what not to say.
When to use: anchor rod plans, embed details, and foundation drawings disagree — or embeds are shown with no size/grade/projection. Highest urgency of any steel RFI: embeds are cast-in.
Subject: RFI [no.] — Anchor rod/embed conflict at [grid], response needed by [date]
Body:
Structural drawing [S-xxx] shows embed plates at [grid/location]; anchor rod plan [S-xxx] shows [conflicting layout / no corresponding embeds]. Foundation drawing [F-xxx] does not resolve the conflict. Please provide governing embed size, material grade, anchor layout, and projection for the listed locations, or confirm detail [x/S-xxx] governs.
Concrete at these locations is scheduled to pour [date]. A response after that date displaces embed installation to post-installed anchors, with cost and schedule impact to be quantified at that time.
Attach: marked-up plan clips of both conflicting drawings, embed schedule if one exists. Impact wording: tie the needed-by date to the pour date — concrete, not steel, sets the clock. Don't say: "the drawings are wrong" — say they conflict; the EOR decides which is right. Escalation (no response by needed-by): "RFI [no.] remains open past the pour-critical date of [date]. We will proceed per [detail x] unless directed otherwise by [date+3], and reserve rights under [contract article] for costs arising from later redirection."
Log every one of these. Submission date, needed-by date, response date, what was held, what it cost. That trail is where steel money leaks — and where it’s recovered.
Drafting aid only — not legal advice. Adapt to your contract's notice requirements; your EOR and contract documents govern. Impact/rights wording is a starting point, not a determination.
A copy-ready RFI or worksheet, a calculator or SDS2 template, and directory updates. No filler, unsubscribe anytime.