When to use it, a subject line, a body you can paste and fill, what to attach, how to word impact, and what not to say.
When to use: the connection the structural details show can't coexist with architectural finishes/clearances (exposed connections, AESS, tight shaft clearances), or delegated-design reactions exceed the typical detail shown.
Subject: RFI [no.] — Connection conflict at [member/grid]: structural detail vs architectural [finish/clearance]
Body:
Detail [x/S-xxx] shows a [bolted double-angle / extended shear tab / moment] connection at [location]. Architectural drawing [A-xxx] shows [flush finish / reveal / clearance] at the same location that the detailed connection cannot achieve. Please confirm the governing connection type, or provide direction on [concealing / relocating / redesigning] the connection. If AESS applies, confirm category.
Detailing of affected members is on hold pending response.
Attach: both detail clips, a simple sketch of the physical conflict if you can draw it in five minutes — sketches get faster answers. Impact wording: "on hold" with the member list; quantify only when the hold actually moves the schedule. Don't say: proposed redesigns as assertions. Offer options as questions; the answer must come from the EOR. Escalation: re-send with the shop-drawing submittal date it now jeopardizes.
Log every one of these. Submission date, needed-by date, response date, what was held, what it cost. That trail is where steel money leaks — and where it’s recovered.
Drafting aid only — not legal advice. Adapt to your contract's notice requirements; your EOR and contract documents govern. Impact/rights wording is a starting point, not a determination.
A copy-ready RFI or worksheet, a calculator or SDS2 template, and directory updates. No filler, unsubscribe anytime.